The dissertation file is not currently available for this title.

Abstract

This research analyses how Johnny Depp uses humour throughout his 2020 defamation trial, which garnered a large social media following. Short recordings of the trial circulated online with the hashtag #justiceforDepp, some of which accumulating billions of views. The main theme for analysis is the use of humour and how this affects Depp’s presentation of self and how he minimises the credibility of evidence. While there are many different forms of humour throughout the trial, this research focuses on three of the most prevalent forms: sarcasm, retorts, and self-depreciation. This research uses Discursive Psychology as the analytical method given its ability to consider social interactions in context, and the impact language has on interactions. This is particularly relevant when considering the roles of the courtroom and the value of language when giving testimony.
Findings suggest that Depp deploys humour in a variety of ways, firstly as a method of undermining the credibility of Benjamin Rottenborn (Amber Heard’s attorney who carried out the cross examination), and secondly, to affiliate information, presenting himself as an honest and reliable plaintiff. This research also considers the use and flouting of Grice’s Conversational Maxims (particularly quality and quantity) and how Depp uses humour to navigate these. Overall, sarcasm, retorts and self-deprecation are deployed by Depp to support his own testimony either through positive presentation of self, or the reduction of Rottenborn’s credibility

Course: English Language and Linguistics - BA - C2742S

Date Deposited: 2023-07-28

URI/permalink: https://library.port.ac.uk/dissert/dis14176.html