Bibliographic details and abstracts are available to all. Downloads of full-text dissertations are restricted to University of Portsmouth members who must login. MPhils may be accessed by all.

Abstract

intervention for humanitarian reasons has gained notoriety and sparked a complex discussion in the field of international relations studies. The Responsibility to Protect doctrine is a significant, yet debated international norm that is enforced by states and institutions to avert atrocity crimes. However, the analysis of literature and examples of past and present humanitarian crises has had a profound impact on how the doctrine is implemented and perceived. By examining underlying motives from case studies such as Myanmar, Darfur, Libya and Syria, the research uncovers divisions between the moral imperative in protecting vulnerable populations and the selective nature of interventions to safeguard national interests. The research acknowledges the interplay and complex relation of power politics and the practicality of military intervention for humanitarian goals. Drawing upon realist tendencies, which emphasise states self-interests to ensure personal power and security, this research investigates the anarchic system. The themes identified stem from competitive, power struggles that have hindered effective R2P responses. By employing a realist evaluation of the CIMO framework, the dissertation examines the contextual factors shaping certain interventions in both Libya and Syria. In addition, the mechanisms employed, and the outcomes they yielded. Using a qualitative literature research approach, an analysis of comparative case studies of R2P-related activities in Libya and Syria reveals patterns of paralysing veto-situations from UNSC members. Realpolitik considerations have impeded cohesive and timely responses. This study emphasises how national interests and concerns about sovereignty determine the results and effectiveness of R2P initiatives. This research contributes to theoretical discussion and scholarly debates on the effectiveness of R2P, alongside how future interventions for military purposes have created a situation whereby states interest has often come before the prevention of mass atrocities.

Course: International Relations - MA - P2929FTD

Date Deposited: 2024-02-02

URI/permalink: https://library.port.ac.uk/dissert/dis14357.html