Bibliographic details and abstracts are available to all. Downloads of full-text dissertations are restricted to University of Portsmouth members who must login. MPhils may be accessed by all.

Abstract

There is a lack of understanding regarding the impact of canned hunting on conservation efforts. Aside from legal frameworks and ecotourism, conservation efforts need to consider less-explored methods due to the unprecedented decline of species and ecosystems. Shooting captive-bred animals is known as canned hunting, which is a contentious activity. For the most part, if canned hunting is completed under supervision, the selective hunting of animals is relieved, which is why some have purported canned hunting as a conservation tool. Currently there is no proof this is true. The potential for canned hunting to aid conservation efforts and serve as a tool has been critically examined within this dissertation. Results demonstrate that canned hunting can be supported as a conservation effort by providing various financial incentives. However, this study has been unable to demonstrate that the benefits of canned hunting outweigh the realness of its potential detrimental impacts. Insufficient empirical data exists to substantiate claims that canned hunting is an efficient conservation tool. As a result of this study, it can be recognised that there are growing ethical concerns raised by the Cecil the Lion case study. Additionally, the necessity of accurately assessing the impacts of canned hunting on wildlife populations and ecosystems, along with the true economic benefits associated with the practice, are required for a more comprehensive understanding. Identifying these issues is crucial for directing future policy choices and management approaches concerning trophy hunting endeavours.

Course: Criminology and Forensic Studies - BSc (Hons) - C2039F

Date Deposited: 2024-11-21

URI/permalink: https://library.port.ac.uk/dissert/dis14550.html